Tag Archives: skills

Send a Letter to the President on October 17

Diane Ravitch is encouraging students, parents, teachers and administrators to send a letter on October 17.  This is a link to her blog: http://dianeravitch.net/2012/10/03/send-a-letter-to-the-president-on-october-17/

 

Here is the letter I will be sending:

Dear President Obama,

I am  teacher and a lifelong Democrat.  I have voted in every presidential election since I was old enough to vote. I’m certainly not going to vote for Mr. Romney but for the first time in my adult life I am considering not voting at all.  I can not in good conscience support the educational policies espoused by you and your Secretary of education, Arne Duncan. I know many teachers who are facing the same crisis of conscience. When you ran for president four years ago, I like many of my colleagues, were full of hope that that you might take measures to address the negative outcomes that were the result of  the No Child Left Behind mandates.  Instead, The Race to the Top, standardization, and privatization are destroying our public schools.

Although I agree that teachers should not be evaluated by test scores, this is not my principle concern.  Inside the school building, there are three stakeholders. The students, the teachers and the administrators.  A wise middle school principal of my acquaintance has pointed out that the students should always be considered first, the teachers second and the administrators third.  When so much time is being spent on teaching the student how to do well on standardized tests, can it truly be argued that we are putting the student first?  Bloom’s revised taxonomy  suggests that there are six levels of learning.  The bottom of the pyramid starts with remembering and then moves upwards to understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and finally creating.  At best, standardized testing might measure the bottom two skills.  The united States has always been recognized for its innovation and creativity.  Do we really want our teachers to ignore the top four learning skills in order to conform to a “one size fits all” concept that doesn’t recognize student abilities, interests and needs.  The other major stakeholder in education is our students’ parents.  We are seeing more and more of them who are expressing dismay at what we have to do to keep from becoming a school in need of improvement. Many are seeking alternatives such as Waldorf Schools where students are treated as creative human beings rather than as fodder for data. I come from a long tradition of teachers and even my own grandchildren are all going to a Waldorf School.  My daughters’ families are willing to  make personal financial sacrifices so that their sons and daughters will not be exposed to the standardization that was mandated by the Bush Administration and now yours.

I have been fortunate to witness the the outcomes of student based learning.  Students who are engaged in an environment where they may pursue some of their own interests blossom into true learners.  Standardized testing is alienating not only our teachers but also, more importantly, our students.  NECAP test prep is about the worst possible way I can think of to engage  potential learners at the start of a new school year.  I actually had a student suggest to me that we should find a way to fill a bucket with what is on the tests.  Then we should bore a hole in the students’ heads and pour the contents of the bucket into the hole.  Is this how we want our students to see education?
The Common Core Standards may very well be useful guidelines but they do not teach the students to infer. Interpreted literally, they are fostering a mentality coming from the top down that each teacher must cover the same material at exactly the same pace and during the same time period.  Most teachers don’t believe in this methodology but  they are afraid to speak up in fear of losing their jobs.  The top levels of the taxonomy are being lost to what appears to be an effort to make everyone be the same.  21st Century learners need to be creative problem solvers, not mindless automatons.  Studies have shown that formative assessment is much more effective than summative assessment and yet we we spend an inordinate amount of time on cumulative assessments that address only the lower levels of learning.  As one educator has said,”Rigor is not giving the students difficult stuff, it is the quality of the feedback.”  The feedback from standardized tests is not high quality.   Noam Chomsky from MIT has pointed out that it is not what is covered that is important, it is what the student discovers that matters.

Mr. President and Mr. Duncan please realize that your present policies are not only demoralizing teachers, these policies are also doing our students a great disservice.  Those of us who choose to teach do it not for monetary reward. it is however not unreasonable to assume that we should be able to earn a respectable professional income.  We don’t work to win monetary recognition for high test scores.  Doing so does not set a good example for our students.  Bribing our students to do well on the tests is also not a good model for future adult behavior.

I want to support you on November 6 but I don’t know if I can.  Do we really want a society where only the students who go to private schools will be the creative thinkers of the future?  Education is not a basketball game.  The Race To The Top only creates a few winners and many losers. The losers are also the future of our country.  Please listen to those of us who have devoted our lives to helping our students become lifelong learners and thoughtful productive citizens in a free society. Diversity, not standardization is what has brought out the best in the United States of America.

Rick Davidson
Computer Technology Integrator
Kingswood Regional Middle School
Wolfeboro, NH


The Common Core-4 Critical Questions by Jill Spencer

Strict or loose interpretation of the Common Core:  http://brightfutures4me.wordpress.com/2012/03/06/questions-about-implementation-of-common-core/

THE 33 DIGITAL SKILLS EVERY 21ST CENTURY TEACHER SHOULD HAVE

From Educational Technology and Mobile Learning  http://www.educatorstechnology.com/2012/06/33-digital-skills-every-21st-century.html

“What Does It Take For A Project To Be Authentic” By John Larmer

http://www.edutopia.org/blog/authentic-project-based-learning-john-larmer?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+scottmcleoddelicious+%28Scott+McLeod%27s+Delicious+Bookmarks%29

15 Favorite iPad Apps selected by teachers from K Walsh (Emerging Ed Tech)

http://www.emergingedtech.com/2012/03/15-favorite-ipad-apps-as-selected-by-teachers/

Tony Wagner’s “The Global Achievement Gap” Rick Davidson

Tony Wagner’s “The Global Achievement Gap” Rick Davidson

(“Learning is Not Standardized”  Linda Darling-Hammond )

I have just received a book that the SAU purchased in the hopes, I imagine, of contributing to my evolution as an effective educator. I have not read the book yet but the blurb on the back cover was enough to get my intellectual juices flowing. The book is called “The Global Achievement Gap” by Tony Wagner. On one level, I ordered this book in the hopes that it might help me understand why we, in the American School System, justify so much testing and standardization. Instead, Mr. Wagner appears to be yet another proponent of what is becoming recognized as a different movement in 21st Century education. Everything I have absorbed from a myriad of books, blogs, magazine articles, TV shows, interviews, and keynote speakers indicates that tomorrow’s survival skills are not to be found in nineteenth century educational practices. Even in those days, voices such as John Dewey encouraged project based learning that encouraged students to be active researchers, not receptacles of the teacher’s assumed knowledge and wisdom. “Dewey was a relentless campaigner for reform of education, pointing out that the authoritarian strict, pre-ordained knowledge approach of modern traditional education was too concerned with delivering knowledge, and not enough with understanding students’ actual experiences.” (Neil, J. (2005) ”John Dewey, the Modern Father of Experiential Education” )

So I had to ask myself, am I truly providing my students with Tony Wagner’s Seven Survival Skills for Teens Today? Forgetting that my prejudice is that technology must play an important part in helping students acquire these skills, I wonder whether we are not short changing our future citizens when we don’t pay attention to what is a recurrent message from the experts. Education should not be a matter of merely accumulating knowledge. We can find the answer to just about everything on a computer or, for that matter, on an iPhone. Higher order thinking skills are essential to success in our incredibly fast changing world. Whether we like or approve of this future is irrelevant. It is here and we and our students need to know how to survive and thrive in it. The other reoccurring theme that I hear is that we, as teachers, have to model these skills in order to be effective educators.

Seven Survival Skills for Teens Today:

Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving
Collaboration across Networks and Leading by Influence
Agility and Adaptability
Initiative and Entrepreneurialism
Effective Oral and Written Communication
Accessing and Analyzing Information
Curiosity and Imagination

As Albert Einstein said:

“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress and giving birth to evolution.”

Einstein would love google. Are we listening?

Interesting Article on Wikipedia From 19 Pencils Blog

http://blog.19pencils.com/2012/03/19/redefining-research/?utm_source=19Pencils+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3abf02f7e9-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

Google Apps Training

Tips For Using iPads

An Interesting Article from Cathy N. Davidson

An interview with  Cathy N Davidson at Dartmouth College: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zO09G5vEnbY